Juicio RICO (2011-Presente)

Chevron vs. Donziger: Another Victory For Chevron, Reports To The Contrary Notwithstanding

Forbes - Michael I. Krauss 08/03/2021

Chevron vs. Donziger: Another Victory For Chevron, Reports To The Contrary Notwithstanding / Foto: Juicio Crudo

Chevron vs. Donziger: Another Victory For Chevron, Reports To The Contrary Notwithstanding / Foto: Juicio Crudo

On March 4, 2021, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a decision on seveal appeals filed by Steven Donziger, the now-disbarred attorney who had obtained a mammoth judgment against Chevron CVX +1% in Ecuador after bribing the Ecuadorean trial judge and ghost-writing his opinion.

To recall (for details see earlier Forbes columns of mine), seven years ago, after a seven-week trial, the federal District Court for New York’s Southern District entered a final judgment under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The judgment awarded damages in the form of litigation costs and attorneys’ fees to Chevron, imposed a constructive trust for Chevron’s benefit on funds obtained by Donziger traceable to the Ecuadorian judgment, and enjoined Donziger from seeking to enforce the Ecuadorian judgment in the United States and from engaging in activities that would allow him to profit from the fraudulently procured judgment. The Second Circuit has already affirmed the RICO judgment, and the Supreme Court denied further review. [Chevron Corp. v. Donziger, 833 F.3d 74 (2d Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2268 (2017).] Following that RICO judgment, a supplemental judgment quantified the costs awarded to Chevron for successfully litigating the RICO action. Donziger appealed, contesting that calculation of costs. Donziger also appealed several of the district court’s civil contempt orders arising out of Donziger’s alleged violations of the injunction issued against him, when he continued to receive monthly retainer payments totaling over $1 million, drawn from funds largely raised by selling to investors contingent shares in any eventual judgment.. Finally, Donziger appealed the court’s judgment awarding attorneys’ fees to Chevron.

On March 4 the Second Circuit court concluded that the district court did not err in awarding costs to Chevron. With one exception, it also affirmed the district court’s finding that Donziger violated the injunction issued against him in several respects, and confirmed the civil contempt condemnations relating to those violations.

On one issue the Second Circuit held that a very clear part of the injunction prohibiting Donziger from raising funds abroad by selling interests in the fraudulent Ecuadorian judgment had been rendered slightly ambiguous by the district court’s subsequent explanation of that injunction. The plain language of the injunction by the District Court was legal and clear. Paragraph one imposed “a constructive trust for the benefit of Chevron on all property . . . which Donziger [had or would obtain] . . . that is traceable to the [Ecuadorian] Judgment or the enforcement of the Judgment anywhere in the world.” Donziger may not profit from selling any interest he might have in the Ecuadorian judgment because such funds would be “traceable to the [j]udgment,” id., and subject to the constructive trust. Paragraph five forbade Donziger “from undertaking any acts to monetize or profit from the [Ecuadorian] Judgment . . . including without limitation by selling, assigning, pledging, transferring or encumbering 31 any interest therein.” The Circuit Court majority would have found Donziger liable for contempt for violating those two clear paragraps were it not for a subsequent statement by the trial court that might, perhaps, have injected ambiguity into the prohibition.

VMware BRANDVOICE | Paid Program

Faster To The Future Of Banking


UNICEF Is Improving Water And Sanitation Facilities In Zambia To Help Children Thrive

Civic Nation BRANDVOICE | Paid Program

The Best Job In The World

A vigorous dissent denied that there was any ambiguity, and that Donziger was clearly in contempt of court on all alleged counts. Remarkably, the majority conceded that the dissent’s argument was “reasonable,” but it gave Donziger the benefit of the doubt.

So let’s recap the contents of this decision:


  • The Second Circuit reminded readers that clear and convincing evidence established that “... Donziger, among other things, bribed the presiding judge to enter a judgment in his clients’ favor in exchange for $500,000 of the judgment’s proceeds; coerced the court to appoint a hand-picked expert whom Donziger paid for favorable testimony; and ghost-wrote the Ecuadorian Judgment ‘in whole or in major part” with only “light editing” by the judge who signed it.
  • The Second Circuit confirmed the District Court’s condemnation of Donziger to pay Chevron court costs of $813,602.71. The District Court had also found Donziger liable to pay Chevron well over $3 million in attorneys’ fees — that amount will now be recalculated by subtracting the fees incurred for the one contempt count that is being vacated, but will surely remain very substantial.
  • Donziger may not invoke an excuse of ambiguity in the future. Donziger can no longer sell any interests in the fraudulent Ecuadorian judgment for any reason, use any received proceeds for his business or personal benefit, or profit from sales related to the judgment in any way whatsoever.